www-us.org

Chapter 119: The Impossible Problem

Of all the intractable, vicious, and seemingly unsolvable problems that landed on the Resolute Desk, none was more freighted with history, theology, and raw human pain than the perpetual conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. A fresh wave of violence, a brutal cross-border attack and an even more brutal reprisal, had once again thrown the region into chaos.

President Corbin chose to address the issue not in a press conference, but in a solemn, televised address from the Oval Office. He sat at his desk, his expression grim, his hands clasped before him.

He began with an act of moral clarity that was a direct indictment of the entire world’s decades-long failure. “For more than seventy years,” he said, his voice a low, somber note, “the world has allowed the Palestinian people to languish in a state of perpetual limbo. We have funded refugee camps that have become multi-generational prisons of hopelessness. My predecessors, the United Nations, the neighboring countries—we have all been content to manage the problem, to put a bandage on the wound, to fund the misery. But no one has had the courage to demand a permanent solution. This is a moral failure of the highest order, and it is a failure that we all share.”

He then pivoted to the immediate crisis, re-framing it not as a local uprising, but as a calculated act of global proxy warfare.

“My administration’s intelligence assessment is clear and unequivocal,” he stated, his voice now cold and hard. “The horrific attack on Israeli civilians was not a spontaneous act of resistance. It was an operation conceived, funded, and directed by the regime in Iran, and it was executed as a strategic gift to their patron in Moscow. It was a birthday present to Vladimir Putin, a man who has openly called on his allies in the axis of evil to stir up chaos around the globe to distract the West from his war in Ukraine. The Venezuelan provocations in South America, the saber-rattling in the Pacific, and this attack—they are all fronts in the same war.”

“Therefore,” he continued, “while we fully support Israel’s right to defend itself, let us be clear who the real culprits are. The real culprits are the puppet masters in Tehran and Moscow. We have rightly targeted the mercenary soldiers on the ground in Palestine. But we have failed to adequately target the orchestrators of the attack.”

He then turned his analytical lens on the attackers themselves, his diagnosis a brutal and deliberate act of de-romanticization.

“We must stop calling these Hamas fighters ‘militants’ or ‘warriors,’” he said with a quiet contempt. “They are mercenaries. They are not patriots fighting for a nation. They are, for the most part, deeply chauvinistic and disaffected young men, fed a diet of nihilistic ideology and paid with foreign money. They are the Middle Eastern equivalent of a violent street gang, drawn to the promise of money, power, and a deluded sense of self-worth.”

“Their profound disregard for human life, especially the lives of women, is not a bug in their system; it is the core feature. Their decision to target the peaceful, scantily clad young women at the Nova music festival was not a random act of terror; it was a specific, ideological targeting of the free, modern woman they so despise. And their knowledge that their own women and children would bear the brunt of the inevitable Israeli response is not a sign of their courage; it is a sign of their monstrous, misogynistic depravity.” He added a final, chilling detail. “And for the leaders, it is also a business. There is credible speculation that some in the Hamas leadership, knowing the attack was coming, used that information to place massive hedges against Israeli companies on the global markets, profiting from the very slaughter they initiated.”

Having delivered his devastating diagnosis, he turned to the future. His prognosis was grim, unsentimental, and devoid of the easy platitudes of traditional diplomacy.

“The trust between these two peoples has been shattered, perhaps for a generation. The dream of a traditional two-state solution, of a sovereign Palestinian state with its own military, is, for the foreseeable future, a fantasy. It may be a century before that trust can be rebuilt.”

“But we cannot allow another generation to rot in a state of hopelessness,” he said. “Therefore, the United States will put its full diplomatic weight behind a new, realistic, and long-term solution: the creation of a demilitarized but economically vibrant and self-governing Palestinian entity. Its security, both internal and external, will be guaranteed not by its own non-existent army, but by a coalition of moderate Arab states, in full partnership with Israel and the West. We will lead a global effort to invest massively in its economy, its infrastructure, and its education system, but that investment will be strictly and irrevocably tied to a complete and total de-radicalization of that education system.”

He looked directly into the camera, his face a mask of solemn resolve. “This is the only path forward. It is not a path that offers a glorious victory to anyone. It is a long, difficult, and imperfect path. But it is the only path that offers a glimmer of hope for a future that is not one of perpetual, unending war.”

The Discourse, 119; The Moral Calculus of an Impossible Problem

Section 119.1: Re-framing the Conflict: From Local Dispute to Global Proxy War

President Corbin’s first and most crucial strategic move is to re-frame the entire Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The conventional narrative, for decades, has been to view it as a localized, indigenous dispute over land and nationalism. Corbin rejects this frame entirely. His analysis, based on his administration's intelligence assessment, is that the Hamas attack was not an independent act of "resistance," but a deliberate act of proxy warfare. He explicitly names the state actors—Iran and Russia—as the true orchestrators. The framing of the attack as a "birthday present to Putin" is a brilliant and devastating piece of rhetoric. It demotes Hamas from a primary political actor to a mere tool, a pawn in a much larger geopolitical chess game being played by America's great power rivals. This re-framing has several strategic effects: it shifts the moral blame to the state sponsors, it justifies a different and more targeted set of international responses, and it breaks the intellectual stagnation that has paralyzed the debate for years.

Section 119.2: A Sociological Diagnosis of the "Mercenary"

Corbin's diagnosis of the Hamas fighters is a deliberate and provocative act of de-romanticization. He refuses to grant them the status of "freedom fighters" or even "terrorists" in the traditional sense. Instead, he applies a cold, sociological and economic lens, defining them as "mercenaries." This is a powerful indictment based on several key observations:

• The Financial Motive: The argument that they are primarily motivated by money from abroad, and the specific, damning detail about leaders potentially profiting from hedges against Israeli companies, strips their cause of any moral or ideological legitimacy.

• The Psychological Motive: The comparison to a street gang member is a profound psychological insight. It argues that the true motivation is not a grand political vision, but a search for status, power, and a sense of self-worth by angry, dispossessed young men.

• The Misogyny as a Core Indicator: The explicit focus on their violent misogyny—the targeting of "free women" at a peace festival—is used as a key piece of evidence. It is an argument that an organization that holds such profound contempt for the humanity of women cannot be a legitimate national liberation movement. It is, by its very nature, a depraved death cult.

Section 119.3: The Unsentimental Realist Solution

Having diagnosed the problem in this brutal, unsentimental way, Corbin's proposed solution is equally realistic and devoid of idealism. He explicitly rejects the traditional, but now fantasy-based, two-state solution as an immediate possibility. His statement that a sovereign Palestinian military might be impossible for "perhaps a century" is a shocking but honest assessment of the profound and total destruction of trust between the two peoples. His proposed solution—a demilitarized, economically viable, and internationally supervised entity—is a classic technocratic, systems-based approach. It is a form of trusteeship. It seeks to solve the immediate human and economic problems of the Palestinian people while simultaneously acknowledging the non-negotiable security realities of the Israelis. It is a long-term, incremental, and deeply pragmatic plan that offers no one a glorious victory, but offers everyone a potential path away from perpetual, catastrophic violence. It is an engineer's solution to a problem that has, for too long, been left to poets and warriors.